Were the principal statements fairly presented?
Yes, under New Jersey’s required regulatory basis. The Current, Grant, Trust, and General Capital funds received unmodified opinions.
Open the auditor’s report2025 municipal audit explorer
Search all 17 findings, follow the City’s promised deadlines, compare debt and deferred-charge measures, and open every figure in the official source documents.
First, separate the questions
Yes, under New Jersey’s required regulatory basis. The Current, Grant, Trust, and General Capital funds received unmodified opinions.
Open the auditor’s reportYes. The report lists 17 findings, including material weaknesses in financial closing and fixed-asset reporting.
Open the findings sectionNo. Auditors disclaimed an opinion on fixed assets because the 2025 inventory was not updated and could not be audited.
Open the fixed-assets findingAbout the adverse GAAP language: the audit explains that Jersey City reports on the State’s regulatory basis rather than U.S. GAAP. That framework difference should not be read as a third operational finding.
Three different measures
Current Fund, payroll-clearing, and grant amounts that the regulatory statements carry for later budget funding.
Audit Note 14$660.034 million funded plus $193.620 million unfunded in the capital trial balance. This is capital-financing accounting, not the Note 14 total.
Annual Financial Statement, Sheet 8$1.530 billion of gross debt less $955.430 million of statutory deductions. The filing reports net debt at 1.001% of equalized valuation.
Annual Debt Statement, page 1Do not add the three figures together. They come from different statements, serve different legal and accounting purposes, and overlap conceptually in ways a simple sum would obscure.
Search the record
Amounts and sample exceptions are evidence from the audit. They are not prevalence estimates and should not be extrapolated beyond the tested records.
Try a broader term or clear the filters.
Follow-through calendar
Management’s corrective-action statements are unaudited. Completion is best evaluated through reconciliations, policies, legal conclusions, corrected records, and whether the 2026 audit repeats the issue.
Official document set
Opinions, audited regulatory-basis statements, notes, findings, samples, and recommendations.
Open the signed auditPlanned remedies, target dates, responsible officials, and management-reported completion status. Unaudited.
Open the action planGross debt, statutory deductions, net debt, equalized valuation, guarantees, notes, and excluded commitments.
Open the debt statementTrial balances, budget results, fund balance, capital accounts, grants, and supporting schedules. Not an audit opinion.
Open the financial statementThe City’s Municipal Financial Reports page contains annual audits, corrective-action plans, debt statements, budgets, and annual financial statements.
Plain-language glossary
Method and scope: JC Open Funds reviewed the City’s 2025 annual audit, 2026 corrective-action plan, 2025 annual debt statement, and 2025 annual financial statement. Figures are transcribed from those official documents and rounded only where labeled. The audit’s $296,788 grant-reserve figure differs by $10 from Note 14’s $296,778; the $94,124,946 total follows Note 14. Management responses and the annual filings are distinguished from the independent auditor’s opinions and findings.
Last reviewed August 14, 2026.